Suchergebnisse

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji : (1) pengaruh kejelasan sasaran anggaran terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah, (2) pengaruh pengendalian akuntansi terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah, (3) pengaruh sistem pelaporan terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah, (4) pengaruh pemanfatan teknologi informasi terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah 26 Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Rokan Hilir. Dalam penelitian ini, sampel yang digunakan yaitu berjumlah 51 Responden dengan menggunakan metode proportional stratified random sampling. Penelitian ini menggunakan data primer dengan meyebarkan kuesioner. Metode analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis regresi linear berganda. Alat analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Stastistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) versi 23.0. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa : (1) kejelasan sasaran anggaran berpengaruh terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah dengan tingkat signifikan 0,000 < 0,05, (2) pengendalian akuntansi berpengaruh terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah dengan tingkat signifikan sebesar 0,000 < 0,05, (3) sistem pelaporan berpengaruh terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah dengan tingkat signifikan 0,000 < 0,05, (4 ) pemanfatan teknologi informasi berpengaruh terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah dengan tingkat signifikan 0,000 < 0,05

Purpose
This study aims to examine the effect of social reputation on the relationship between boards and foreign ownership on the quality of sustainability disclosure.


Design/methodology/approach
The sample of this study consists of publicly-traded primary and secondary sector companies in Indonesia for 12 years, from 2009 to 2020. This study uses panel model regression to generate its results. The disclosure data are hand-collected data sourced from annual financial and company sustainability reports.


Findings
Higher foreign board component companies report lower quality of sustainability disclosure, whereas companies that possess foreign ownership components report a higher quality of sustainability disclosure. This result is strengthened by obtaining consistent results tested with economic, social and environmental disclosure components. In addition, if the company has a good social reputation, it will strengthen the relationship of foreign ownership to the quality of sustainability disclosure.


Practical implications
These findings are relevant for policymakers, professional organizations and practitioners in Indonesia and other developing countries.


Originality/value
The moderating effect of social reputation on the relation of the foreign board and foreign ownership-quality of sustainability disclosure as this study does remain rare in developing countries. This study complements various research conducted in developing countries, such as Indonesia, by offering a new dimension. The results indicate that social reputation has a moderating role in determining the impact of foreign ownership on the quality of sustainability disclosure.

In improving its performance, the village government requires to have organizational commitment that supported by apparatus competency and controlled through community participation. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of organizational commitment, community participation, and apparatus competence on village government performance. 200 data collected from questionnaires will be analyzed to identify organizational commitment, community participation, and apparatus competency towards the village government performance. Data analyzed by using SPPS version 25.0. the result of data processing found that organizational commitment, community participation, and apparatus competency affects the village government performance, and the organizational commitment is needed to improve apparatus competency by educating and training its human resources, also the transparency as the form of responsibility of the village government to citizen

Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning villages is the starting point for villages to manage their government independently. However, in the management of government, many villages are still weak in implementing good governance, so that it has an impact on their performance. This study specifically wants to examine the role of good governance in improving the performance of village governments. This study examines the principles of good governance, transparency, accountability, community participation and fairness towards village government performance. The population of this research is the village government in the Meranti Islands Regency. The sampling technique used was area sampling, so that a total sample size of 31 villages was obtained in Tebing Tinggi, Tebing Tinggi Barat and Rangsang Barat, Meranti Islands Regency. Data was collected through a survey by distributing questionnaires to respondents consisting of the village head, village secretary, head of financial affairs and head of general affairs. The analytical method used in this study is multiple regression analysis with the help of SPSS version 23.0. The results showed that transparency, accountability, community participation and justice had a positive effect on the performance of the village government. This indicates that increased transparency, accountability, community participation and justice will improve the performance of village government in Meranti Regency. The research supports the stewardship theory that the village government will act to fulfill the interests of the village community.